From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Yamashita Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add wmclock. Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 13:54:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20160407135455.04d0b41d@openmailbox.org> References: <20160407125715.448ca23b@openmailbox.org> <8760vtjqgc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoEv7-000619-Ih for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:44:46 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoEv1-0008Ps-De for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:44:44 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:34759) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoEv1-0008Po-9o for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 14:44:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoEAD-0002g4-K2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:56:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoEA3-0002ei-Lz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:56:08 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60268) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoEA3-0002ea-IM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:56:07 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoEA2-0002gq-Oj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:56:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9x-0002cp-QH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:56:06 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60163) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9x-0002ch-NU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:56:01 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9w-0002gq-Mf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:56:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9r-0002bl-M3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:56 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:53011) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9r-0002bX-Im for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:55 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56304) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9m-0002gq-MP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9M-0002Ta-B5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:25 -0400 Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:50208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9M-0002TT-8L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:24 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9L-0002g4-CX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9D-0002Ql-0C for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:19 -0400 Received: from smtp23.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.57]:51057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aoE9C-0002QU-NB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Apr 2016 13:55:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8760vtjqgc.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Mathieu Lirzin Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, 07 Apr 2016 19:09:39 +0200 Mathieu Lirzin wrote: > Hello, > > Kei Yamashita writes: > > > From 15c0f48c3b9c510228a95655e11f95dbca5fbf91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 > > 2001 From: Kei Yamashita > > Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:53:43 -0400 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add wmclock. > > > > * gnu/packages/gnustep.scm (wmclock): New variable. > > --- > > > + (build-system gnu-build-system) > > + (arguments > > + `(#:phases > > + (modify-phases %standard-phases > > + (add-after 'unpack 'autoconf > > + (lambda _ (zero? (system* "autoreconf" "-vfi"))))))) > > Does the tarball contains a configure script? If not or if it is not > possible to use it, please provide a commentary to explain why > maintainer tools are required since this is not a expected behavior. > > Thanks, > The tarball requires autoconf to create the configure script. Should I just include that as a comment?