From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pjotr Prins Subject: Re: Struggling with a caching substitute server Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 12:37:05 +0200 Message-ID: <20160405103705.GA3619@thebird.nl> References: <20160404135637.GA30755@thebird.nl> <87zit9axwz.fsf@gnu.org> <20160405075748.GA2689@thebird.nl> <87wpocwgim.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49071) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anONp-0006o6-Rh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 06:38:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anONl-0007PS-SU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 06:38:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wpocwgim.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 11:29:05AM +0200, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > This would obviously be suboptimal. >=20 > Any suggestions? I think is *helpful* when dealing with deployments. At least I know where to look now ;). Multiple missing ACLs could be displayed as one (combined) warning, if noise is a problem. But, personally, I would like to see all warnings for each key at least once. And also for not working URLs. Pj. --=20