From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gnu: util-linux: Add "static" output. Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:21:37 -0400 Message-ID: <20160403192137.GA20109@jasmine> References: <1459603774-9455-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <1459603774-9455-3-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160403005357.GF4959@jasmine> <57016102.2090500@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53614) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amnag-0004FV-Gn for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:21:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amnad-0004o4-9A for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:21:42 -0400 Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:48289) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1amnad-0004o0-2d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:21:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57016102.2090500@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 08:29:22PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > Hullo Leo, > > Thanks, as always, for the review! > > On 03/04/16 02:53, Leo Famulari wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 02, 2016 at 03:29:33PM +0200, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > >> + (add-after > >> + 'install 'move-static-libraries > > > > How about calling the phase 'install-static' as in your btrfs-progs > > patch? > > The two phases do subtly (?) different things. INSTALL-STATIC calls an > additional ‘make install-static’ target that wouldn't be run otherwise. > MOVE-STATIC-LIBRARIES moves some static files already installed to OUT > by the default 'install phase to a different output, STATIC. > > I don't think drawing explicit parallels between the two (by choosing > identical names) makes anything any clearer, but have no strong feelings > either way. Okay, that makes sense. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R >