From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add freefall.
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:34:47 -0400
Message-ID: <20160317043447.GC8344@jasmine>
References: <1458099269-19695-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com>
	<20160316064747.GA30457@jasmine>
	<CAKFHe2QnLPo0pjXA9C9LobAJ0tL7S03XPwASkjBY=wF8E257EQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42948)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1agPe7-00024T-GD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:34:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1agPe4-0005LP-AJ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:34:51 -0400
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:36429)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1agPe4-0005LH-6G
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:34:48 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAKFHe2QnLPo0pjXA9C9LobAJ0tL7S03XPwASkjBY=wF8E257EQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:09:06PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> On 16/03/2016, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
> > Do you think we should change the 'alarm' value as in the Nix package?
> 
> (Disclaimer of sorts: I wrote that package as well, a long time ago.
> For the same machine I'm hoping to migrate to Guix soon.)

Now I always check nixpkgs for your packages :)

Pushed as 08e9daf505.

> 
> Yes please! Since the main purpose of this package is peace of mind, I
> consider it worth patching.
> 
> In my very scientific tests of pretend-dropping my laptop and watching
> the HDD LED, the default seemed needlessly short. I've seen expensive
> things bounce about for much longer...
> 
> Should I add a separate .patch file for this, or just do it inline like Nix?
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> T G-R