From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add freefall. Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:34:46 +0200 Message-ID: <20160316203446.3b746a89@debian-netbook> References: <1458099269-19695-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160316064747.GA30457@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/uPVU0pRwS5=v_MeyNyp86yX"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agGHb-00031R-A0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:35:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agGHY-00080n-43 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:34:59 -0400 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:35716) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1agGHX-00080h-UF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:34:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/uPVU0pRwS5=v_MeyNyp86yX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:06 +0100 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > On 16/03/2016, Leo Famulari wrote: > [...] =20 >=20 > (Disclaimer of sorts: I wrote that package as well, a long time ago. > For the same machine I'm hoping to migrate to Guix soon.) >=20 > Yes please! Since the main purpose of this package is peace of mind, I > consider it worth patching. >=20 > In my very scientific tests of pretend-dropping my laptop and watching > the HDD LED, the default seemed needlessly short. I've seen expensive > things bounce about for much longer... >=20 > Should I add a separate .patch file for this, or just do it inline like N= ix? >=20 > Kind regards, >=20 > T G-R >=20 I personally prefer inline as long as it isn't too big/hard. In my unscientific understanding of it, it allows people who don't use substitutes to be more self-reliant. --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/uPVU0pRwS5=v_MeyNyp86yX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW6adHAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TRncP/ifXEEBmJUZ7KyiaW0N3nXvi DqsVZerTlZ5IGH+xOYG9hONI2jWzYNF00Ntx4AJjrb9pnGBQUGRJbxlguFSsNLEm TX/7lup9M+6oSb5Ntb5FnFq1P+v47zo3wJu91farsrj32Cqzkvev6EJVdVVCB61d DANWuJbFEWFh0az3x2sxUalxehxUai6XrPZbYFrJn8Px4xARx0YjodbX18BHngV+ 9UoXicaUUkOJ3h/UoI6ZypbkcXH98llB/CkPcKo6yP7hcLqzIqVcRT7H9Q8bryML FehChRa/HJxHJRzedsqUTY7WPzxsg7Ni6NsKM0wroHXuXWMva3piqdPt2CYiK+sY pqdjQS1GF9WHsNQnlZc1jT8mYjHjtfslZNs+j6KEFOksjxxhPBVag7D0e1HA0VQr bHPsTsqj8ogcFwrRJqkvBnAqC9uc0YGUTlRexzl4XvlikoDXVyW4AXdoSSzdGoSb 8/tTrys5kvjvNYWkzxMHwNlz1hjyxWfB26HDvYFyBOHRE3KMMxKlG7lzLmp2Vhv3 0acNtzlq85GyO3hobFiPItqXHhKuyfGxpqFiqfSmOlXuvEH9IpUq6UmVHmrWMjbB WX2JmnAZdNwiD0oQYH5srpPFDTQwn0aRNUbUTrNNj7lrHmT7nmjSo2g1Yd2OIO7Z cnHuaLoav5mBsDngySJ3 =Re4J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/uPVU0pRwS5=v_MeyNyp86yX--