From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gnu: Add gdk-pixbuf+svg. Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 20:13:05 +0100 Message-ID: <20160315191305.GA20053@solar> References: <1457959093-5504-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com> <20160314203858.GA8309@solar> <874mc85bpn.fsf@member.fsf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afuP4-0000Px-0a for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:13:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afuP0-0003Jq-Nl for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:13:13 -0400 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:25296) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1afuP0-0003Jd-Bf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 15:13:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <874mc85bpn.fsf@member.fsf.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?utf-8?B?5a6L5paH5q2m?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 05:31:32PM +0800, 宋文武 wrote: > gdk-pixbuf+svg depends on librsvg, while librsvg depends on gdk-pixbuf, > so I think there must be two version. and the closure size of > gdk-pixbuf+svg is 210MB while gdk-pixbuf has 116MB, so I think we should > using the large one only when necessary. Okay, thanks for the explanation; maybe you could add it also as a comment to the patch, so that later we do not wonder why there are two packages. Andreas