From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: Updating Vim Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:35:17 +0200 Message-ID: <20160309123517.29f7cb9e@debian-netbook> References: <20160309091616.GA20945@debian-netbook> <20160309094544.GA28981@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/7qC4D.N8zSudsc9yz0_pgms"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adbSm-0006kb-D1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 05:35:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adbSe-000723-Iz for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 05:35:32 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:46686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adbSe-00071e-Am for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 05:35:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160309094544.GA28981@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/7qC4D.N8zSudsc9yz0_pgms Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 9 Mar 2016 10:45:44 +0100 Andreas Enge wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 11:16:16AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > [...] =20 >=20 > Well, it is not quite a release, I would say, if they simply tag every git > commit and do not even make sure that the tests succeed each time. Normal= ly, > our policy in guix is to follow "official" upstream releases. >=20 > Is there a compelling reason to update nevertheless? >=20 > Andreas >=20 There was something that was not interacting well with my .vimrc, but I just checked with 7.4 and 7.4.963 and there wasn't actually a change. Either I stopped using some plugin that wanted a newer version or I misread it befor= e. "Because its 2 years old" isn't a great reason. There is a list of patches with a 1-liner[1] for what it fixes, so I suppose for that it would be good to have those issues taken care of, and also to have our copy of vim more up-to-date with other distros. [1] ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/7.4/README --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/7qC4D.N8zSudsc9yz0_pgms Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW3/xlAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TL38P/j7b9l5iwlPQqzzzxBdu8bpU vyJSzoeLZcbQJwHFnUXUZRPGlj13ApMUAdPguCkJqeXr1ALZYzijUzMWuKofomfs 9qQLdVeaen398bgrPJdwT3P5IsISDCoKfJS8TPtD12rtmx5t+ZDwkkI78e/zjFre NXkFFmslc5WnhQ0ZuMLZfSt+ICeVzEl5hfxTO2qRThO7fKq7itdt4g8tb6FSGJol SjGCAXXgsZlwLoYpszkVz/lBMbTmz6JXi40V4ujl9iTh6Df3FuQu18vkrq0hvjvT lizG0sFc8Vhqdh9THUxeeKm92VlIxxsDdnB5WKrLeKd32K0+xiBLZeHPGEfzNwL5 T/2DveIcp/yX+m1Pd1pgLjmisO4UoEvfZKvkLGHraSl3vGw8OJ1WhJErJJwKPIEa NtgvpzWunOWgLNdJGxItVVRe4b8HV2xGwaH1c19FFKnb6s/Q6j3+FPq4LlgK19Ge LEudwC9rJBDyCbu+PS7k/5QDa6l6+EpAxtRSCfXjIgDMUXFixpdG64yNoNUbTYzR eNiU7yhJ/RTY6sKE5ukNdM955K/Kl6TsTQuVeqeaPbobKD/Sb2XfYxXMAL2hGBTu Gj26YJnCAP+jK1Mxz1tNSibZHCi6AJuT0iMgGXC6a2J6akFnIrnsZMbKf2Dr1+j2 cxVERZubVMfmAz4t9s4P =1G0o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7qC4D.N8zSudsc9yz0_pgms--