From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Include CodingQuarry gene predictor Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 18:39:37 -0500 Message-ID: <20160308233937.GB24107@jasmine> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47596) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adREI-0008BK-PN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:39:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adREF-0002b0-K9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:39:54 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:60279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adREF-0002ar-G5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:39:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rob Syme Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:13:34PM +0800, Rob Syme wrote: Thank you for the patch! > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm: Add codingquarry package description When adding packages, we have a preferred format for the commit message. It's either the GNU changelog format or a slightly modified version (I'm not sure). You can see a good example in commit 0e2f2aebed. [...] > + (delete 'check) ;; Don't run the 'make check' step of the > gnu-build-system When skippping the tests, we prefer to say why in the comment. It can be as simple as "no test suite" if that is the case. [...] > + (native-inputs `(("python", python-2))) If the software only works with Python 2, I prefer to say so in a comment such as "Only Python 2 is supported." I don't think is official policy but I find it a useful piece of information to leave for other readers. Can you submit a revised patch that addresses these issues?