On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 03:30:40AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 04:12:57PM +0100, Jessica Tallon wrote:
> > I've attached the package so if someone would like to continue, please
> > do so, I won't be. Thanks for your work and suggestions those who've
> > helped me get this far with packaging it :) I've learnt a lot about it.
> 
> I added a wrapper which provides getopt (as well as the rest of
> 'util-linux/bin') to the script at run-time. Is there a way to only
> provide the single executable 'getopt'?
> 
> Either way, I think it's a better solution than propagating util-linux,
> since the wrapper keeps util-linux out of the user's profile.

I realized the script offers a "GETOPT" variable, so this patch uses
that instead. I think this is the best solution.

> 
> What do people think?