From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: bug#22049: libreoffice compile error
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 12:24:45 -0500
Message-ID: <20160301172445.GB6052@jasmine>
References: <21c1059e083d3df68b981cb1a83b3a7c@openmailbox.org>
	<877fl0lugc.fsf@gnu.org>
	<931b1698a0a6d10913db88e944622dc4@openmailbox.org>
	<20151130195654.GA32198@jasmine> <87h9gsvhep.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20160229083540.GA18295@jasmine> <20160229083723.GA18766@jasmine>
	<878u22pbfr.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48404)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aao2l-0001xM-Bt
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:11 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aao2g-0001Pg-Fe
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:07 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59468)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aao2g-0001Pc-C2
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1aao2g-0000LQ-8A
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 12:25:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.22049.B22049.14568530861298@debbugs.gnu.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <878u22pbfr.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: rennes@openmailbox.org, 22049@debbugs.gnu.org

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > Message-Id: <bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82.1456734966.git.leo@famulari.name>
> > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686.
> >
> > Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch,
> > gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files.
> > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them.
> > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/testBox
> > and patch/testBoxAlgo.
> > [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase.
> 
> Cool!
> 
> I think it’d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file, and to
> apply it unconditionally.  WDYT?

Sure, I'll send an updated patch.

I'm wondering — does the current patch handle the conditional
application of the patch properly? Just looking for some feedback on the
approach...

> 
> So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option?

2.0.1 would be a downgrade for us; we are on 2.2.0. I did try it without
success.

> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.