bug#22049: libreoffice compile error

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > Message-Id: <bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82.1456734966.git.leo@famulari.name>
> > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686.
> >
> > Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch,
> > gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files.
> > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them.
> > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/testBox
> > and patch/testBoxAlgo.
> > [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase.
> 
> Cool!
> 
> I think it’d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file, and to
> apply it unconditionally.  WDYT?

Sure, I'll send an updated patch.

I'm wondering — does the current patch handle the conditional
application of the patch properly? Just looking for some feedback on the
approach...

> 
> So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option?

2.0.1 would be a downgrade for us; we are on 2.2.0. I did try it without
success.

> 
> Thanks,
> Ludo’.