From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Efraim Flashner Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix guile-emacs build failure Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 21:50:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20160228215032.78a4a22a@debian-netbook> References: <874mcsd3ha.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/2LRa51Jm67.RhJHsd_mGVa5"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46709) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa7Mh-0006Fl-RZ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:50:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa7Md-00076h-Qb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:50:51 -0500 Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:35804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aa7Md-00076Y-HQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 14:50:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874mcsd3ha.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Sig_/2LRa51Jm67.RhJHsd_mGVa5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:44:33 +0100 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > @@ -255,7 +256,16 @@ without requiring the source code to be rewritten.") > ("flex" ,flex) > ("texinfo" ,texinfo) > ("gettext" ,gnu-gettext) > - ,@(package-native-inputs guile-next))))) > + ,@(package-native-inputs guile-next))) > + ;; Same as in guile-2.0 > + (native-search-paths > + (list (search-path-specification > + (variable "GUILE_LOAD_PATH") > + (files '("share/guile/site/2.0"))) > + (search-path-specification > + (variable "GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH") > + (files '("lib/guile/2.0/ccache" > + "share/guile/site/2.0"))))))) > =20 What happens if you're building it with guile-next? Doesn't the search-path need to be 2.2 or something similar? --=20 Efraim Flashner =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D = =D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8 GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted --Sig_/2LRa51Jm67.RhJHsd_mGVa5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW00+JAAoJEPTB05F+rO6TyRYQAKNHwl5u1VM90rHg+pjKmTTP S7/jtl1dCbXaA+PACfEkG546p7Bj3HuFR6qXNabVoeiXfPlHaTt3vYDJEIoj+4gR wAGsQytqzrNSj4UXemzhGszqD2JTSHBFKFjaSoAIzfyqJBAbTNCCL3LR8ytbgZlE dfSH27vmpLLwULbS4RqnUsr0w8in6G7STZ4zwWPOnWgyt9U+YdXBxdXQsOUEbgLd lP4euMJJ3kcmXNmuQIKrKkWNlcQzG/Muc+dS/q1jFCHUeyuZJDqb3d/NnnTu55ZW KPjiE1V34RckAxkQ/AdlHmcvt05cEOVyW51PQgSx7o5kKvJWRfyFD1zy8zMeJUjF 1IdHEIsnIn74awBASvaWq02PwypkPKkMkwv8njsBXBd+cxg+BrWCDInkE2lu2lYN i0vwl6X+rOR+A6O9WqY4UJ2FXNi2mdmvLxrZnZgMRcjzvlJxoBiPqLrndIKYVf89 lS/mHCY5ZFJQpUfhrukSHDJHupLw4zPwG5LmIaiAMljF3gQig3S1BvyBgowtoaLz 9CkkdoY1fXG7D7sEGi9NcnsRIDSJn/d46sMXBftHmvY1kyylSHQ4mzP/wPtyYuPv XiZVhfbM+9XnwjmS40Ajur0KuJbe5L9Y+ZwRZRP/ow5ZEJeJ/kyryXyt4dXniW6P VI8A+n9HQbhrJsCgOyq5 =phq7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/2LRa51Jm67.RhJHsd_mGVa5--