From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add libzapojit. Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:35:25 -0500 Message-ID: <20160225193525.GC18435@jasmine> References: <58ba5d1146752af014230febb2fd2c49@openmailbox.org> <20160225011441.GA31607@jasmine> <40322f17c87a911d6621a9fbfa070c37@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37143) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ1hI-0001u4-IG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:35:37 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ1hE-0001Ot-4D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:35:36 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:54816) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aZ1hE-0001Oo-0s for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 14:35:32 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40322f17c87a911d6621a9fbfa070c37@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: rennes@openmailbox.org Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 07:59:51AM -0600, rennes@openmailbox.org wrote: > On 2016-02-24 19:14, Leo Famulari wrote: > >On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 04:25:37PM -0600, rennes@openmailbox.org wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>i attached libzapojit patch for review. > > > >Thanks for the patch! > > > >> > >>This is a library for accessing SkyDrive and Hotmail, necessary for > >>documents manager(GNOME apps). > > > >Is the documents manager already packaged? > > > >If so, I assume libzapojit is working for you? > > > >If not, I might want to merge it anyways to encourage further work on > >GNOME stuff by everyone :) > > > >>* gnu/packages/gnome.scm (libzapojit): New variable. > > > >[...] > > > >>+ (build-system gnu-build-system) > > > >I can't tell — should it use glib-or-gtk-build-system instead? It seems > >to build fine as-is, but I wonder because it uses some GLib stuff. > > > >Looks good aside from these questions. > > Hi, > > GNOME documents is not yet packaged, I started packaging requirements, in > this sequence. GNOME documents has several requirements not packaged. or > what is the best strategy to do so? One strategy is to package the entire dependency graph of GNOME Documents privately, and then submit them when the whole thing is ready. You could modify that strategy by sending each package for review as you go, but without merging them into master until everything is done. You could modify it again by having us commit each package to master when it looks good, and then making adjustments later. The benefit of this is that it's very easy for other people to know how to help you with this project, for example by packaging some of the dependencies on their own. I'm not sure what the best strategy is. It's up to you and anyone else who comments :) Please advise!