From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: libwnck Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 12:31:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20160223113138.GA19907@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYBBx-0000Ro-WF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:31:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYBBu-0003oc-P9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:31:45 -0500 Received: from mailrelay1.public.one.com ([91.198.169.124]:19428) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aYBBu-0003oN-Ci for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 06:31:42 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, we have the following in gnome.scm: $ guix package -A libwnck libwnck 2.30.7 out gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1464:2 libwnck 3.14.0 out gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1435:2 However, the first one is internally assigned to the variable "libwnck-1". I assume that someone got inspired by another case where the "-1" is actually a version number. Is it okay if I rename it to "libwnck-2"? Andreas