From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: bug#22740: Freshness check blocks upgrading Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:18:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20160223091824.GD19217@solar> References: <20160219171209.GA530@solar> <87mvqv943a.fsf@gmail.com> <874md0moo2.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2lvolh5.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51855) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY97a-00065x-B3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:19:06 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY97X-0008Ad-2C for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:19:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aY97W-0008AX-Lo for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:19:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aY97W-0003te-Iw for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Feb 2016 04:19:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87k2lvolh5.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: 22740@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:54:30AM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > Attached. I also removed 'check-package-freshness' from (gnu packages) > as it is not used anywhere else, or should it be left? I think it is good, please push. (Assuming that "guix refresh" still works and none of the procedures you remove are still used.) One of the procedures has the comment: "This has a noticeable impact when doing "guix upgrade -u"." It looks like we are going way back into the history of guix! Andreas