From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Names of R packages Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 20:42:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20160222194201.GC29652@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwN0-0005gY-J4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:42:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwMw-00062h-5f for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:42:10 -0500 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:49728) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXwMv-000628-QX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:42:06 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, when tentatively calling "guix refresh", I saw a number of packages called "r-r-...", for instance "r-r-oo". Should this not be simplified to "r-oo"? We do not have separate packaging rules for R, but in analogy with python and perl, it would make sense to preprend "r-" and at the same time drop all other occurrences of R inside the original name. What do you think? Andreas