From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: glibc update
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:47:35 -0500
Message-ID: <20160222174735.GB4836@jasmine>
References: <20160216202010.GA21380@jasmine> <87si0rvh1l.fsf@igalia.com>
	<20160217101012.GB29638@novena-choice-citizen.lan>
	<20160217155903.GA1414@jasmine> <877fhwolxy.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33561)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aXuaG-00045N-5r
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:47:45 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aXuaA-0002ND-UH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:47:42 -0500
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53081)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aXuaA-0002MY-QO
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:47:38 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <877fhwolxy.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 03:32:09PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 09:10:12PM +1100, Jookia wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:10:14AM +0100, Andy Wingo wrote:
> >> > Given that seriousness of this bug and the amount of time that a full
> >> > rebuild will take, does anyone have a graft recipe they would like to
> >> > share?
> >> 
> >> Not really, unfortunately grafts are broken right now. I'm not sure how high a
> >> priority it is to fix it, but from what I know Mark Weaver knows how to fix it.
> >
> > Here is the relevant bug report:
> > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22139
> >
> > Personally, I'd say it's extremely high priority, but I don't know
> > Scheme or Guix internals well enough to fix it myself.
> 
> I agree it’s high-priority.  I’ll take another stab at it.

Christopher linked to some relevant discussions for posterity in the bug
report: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22139#8