From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: btrfs-progs: [trivial] licence correction Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:13:24 -0500 Message-ID: <20160215021324.GA4181@jasmine> References: <1455500864-17360-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aV8fB-00053A-U6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:13:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aV8f8-0004C6-N3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:13:21 -0500 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:36272) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aV8f8-0004BX-JB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:13:18 -0500 Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5447D203E2 for ; Sun, 14 Feb 2016 21:13:18 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1455500864-17360-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:47:43AM +0100, tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com wrote: > Hullo, > > It was pointed out to me that the current licence (‘gpl2+’) for > btrfs-progs is just wrong and should be ‘gpl2’ instead. > > I must have opened one of the few gpl2+-licenced files in the tarball > by sheer bad luck. Here is a patch to set things right. Thanks for the report! I pushed a change that lists the handful of gpl2+ files and names both licenses. > > Kind regards, > > T G-R > > (I struggled to write a ‘GNU-style’ commit message for something so > trivial and probably went overboard. This can be fixed in a later > patch series.) >