From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add slurm-llnl. Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 09:19:38 -0600 Message-ID: <20160211091938.2a364841@openmailbox.org> References: <56bb7530.v5bvas2QpzoMjKMl%pjotr.public12@thebird.nl> <20160210220447.0917f1a1@openmailbox.org> <20160211081534.GA8987@thebird.nl> <20160211100801.GA6109@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> <20160211111127.GA9815@thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTt2D-0005VS-0Q for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:19:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTt29-0005aB-NL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:19:56 -0500 Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33]:58200) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTt29-0005ZD-Ec for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 10:19:53 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20160211111127.GA9815@thebird.nl> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Pjotr Prins Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:11:27 +0100 Pjotr Prins wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 11:08:01AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > > > > I think we should rather use "slurm-wlm" if we are trying to > > > > dissambiguate with the "Slurm the Realtime network interface monitor". > > > The website https://computing.llnl.gov/linux/slurm/ suggests > > > otherwise. Also archlinux took this name > > > https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/slurm-llnl/ > > > > And Debian, but we are free to use our own conventions. Do you think it > > is likely that we will package the other slurm? Otherwise, I would simply > > go with "slurm" now according to our package guidelines; and then we can > > still name the other slurm as slurm-nlm or similar. > > There is already a slurm package. But it does something different. I > propose we do it my way, so outsiders understand it. Let them flock > over from Debian ;) In debian, the "slurm-llnl" is a dummy package to help users transition to the new "slurm-wlm" package. `~Eric