From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add pass. Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 16:33:50 -0500 Message-ID: <20160209213350.GA10329@jasmine> References: <87lh6u6dnj.fsf@tsyesika.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54206) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTFv1-0005zH-KF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:33:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTFuw-00068l-Pr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:33:55 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:33560) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aTFuw-00068d-6x for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Feb 2016 16:33:50 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lh6u6dnj.fsf@tsyesika.se> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jessica Tallon Cc: Guix-devel On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:27:44PM +0100, Jessica Tallon wrote: > * gnu/packages/password-utils.scm (pass): New variable. Thanks! [...] > + (arguments > + '(#:phases > + (alist-delete 'configure %standard-phases) > + #:make-flags (list "CC=gcc" (string-append "PREFIX=" %output)) > + ;; The tests mysteriously hang, I've tired it outside of guix and > + ;; they run perfectly fine. Not sure why so for now I've disabled > + ;; them. > + #:tests? #f It may be worth taking the time to figure out why the test suite fails. My understanding of this password manager is that you can always use gnupg to decrypt the files without the password manager, but I still think it would be best for a password manager to be able to pass its test suite. I'd hate for some user who was not proficient with gnupg to get locked out of their accounts because our pass package was somehow broken. > + #:test-target "test")) > + (inputs `(("gnupg" ,gnupg) Does it matter which version of gnupg is used? We package the 3 branches of it described here: https://gnupg.org/ > + ("pwgen" ,pwgen) > + ("xclip" ,xclip) > + ("git" ,git) > + ("tree" ,tree))) > + (home-page "http://www.passwordstore.org/") > + (synopsis "Encrypted password manager") > + (description "Pass is a password manager which uses gnupg to store, retrieve > +generated passwords. The tool stores each password in its own file gpg > +encrypted allowing the program to be simple yet secure. Synchronization is > +possible with inbuild git support which commits changes to your password database This line should be ≤ 80 characters. > +to a git repository that can be managed through the pass command.") > + (license license:gpl2+))) > -- > 2.6.3 >