From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/04] gnu: xdotools: Update to 3.20150503.1 Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 03:35:50 -0500 Message-ID: <20160206083550.GD1432@jasmine> References: <87d1safqir.fsf@dustycloud.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56733) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRyLV-0008Mj-Ay for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 03:35:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRyLQ-00065z-Vh for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 03:35:57 -0500 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:48787) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRyLQ-00065u-Ru for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 03:35:52 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1safqir.fsf@dustycloud.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christopher Allan Webber Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 07:48:12PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: > From fa531a1f2a6d84232d9c94feb5b3136cd11f83b5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Christopher Allan Webber > Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 15:24:01 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: xdotools: Update to 3.20150503.1 > > * gnu/packages/xdisorg.scm (xdotools): Upgrade to 3.20150503.1. > * gnu/packages/patches/xdotool-fix-makefile.patch: New file. Please add the patch to gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA). [...] > (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append > - "http://semicomplete.googlecode.com/files/" name "-" > - version ".tar.gz")) > + "https://github.com/jordansissel/xdotool/releases/download/v" version Is this line too long? I can't say for sure looking at the patch in my email client. If so, the linter should complain. [...]