From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: R Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 20:02:36 +0100 Message-ID: <20160205190236.GA8063@debian> References: <20160204193924.GA8852@debian> <20160205100040.GA4213@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRleX-0000Np-Pw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:02:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRleT-0003sF-Pm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:02:45 -0500 Received: from mailrelay2.public.one.com ([91.198.169.125]:59069) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRleT-0003s5-E9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:02:41 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 06:17:04PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > I dropped the flag and noticed that OpenBLAS is not mentioned at all (it > does retain a reference, but that’s expected when “openblas” is among > the inputs), so I also dropped “openblas” from the inputs and R built > just fine. Okay. I am giving it a try on arm right now. It looks like we should then also drop "--with-lapack"; the documentation states that this has only an effect when "--with-blas" is also given: https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#LAPACK If compilation succeeds on arm now, I will see whether a reference to lapack is retained or not. Andreas