From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#22558: gnupg-2.1.11 on x86_64 failed its tests many times on Hydra Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 13:58:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20160205185809.GA18204@jasmine> References: <20160204152848.GA4379@debian> <87r3gs9zvf.fsf@gnu.org> <20160204193649.GA8785@debian> <87d1scxkd6.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49569) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRlb0-0007df-Gn for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:59:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRlaw-0003BH-Gv for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:59:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54328) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRlaw-0003B9-9R for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:59:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRlaw-0007wd-19 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 13:59:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: 22558@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 09:25:10AM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote: > >> * With 14 test failures. This happened at least twice, on > >> hydra.gnunet.org. > > > >Eric Bavier reported on #guix that it failed to build on his machine > >twice in a row, with 14 test failures. > > I used 'git bisect' on the gnupg repository to narrow the failures down. > Commit ee87c653bf is the commit that introduces the failures. > > Knowing this however doesn't explain why Ludo was not able to reproduce on > his machine or why Hydra was eventually able to build it successfully. It fails on my x86_64 machine as well, also with those 14 test failures. Will somebody for whom it builds successfully see if it builds reproducibly on their machine? > > -- > `~Eric > > >