From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sdparm. Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 18:01:30 +0100 Message-ID: <20160202170130.GA9601@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> References: <1454396674-24793-1-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <1454396674-24793-2-git-send-email-tobias.geerinckx.rice@gmail.com> <20160202163937.GA9141@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQeKi-0006mg-Vf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:01:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQeKe-00008C-0g for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:01:40 -0500 Received: from mailrelay7.public.one.com ([91.198.169.215]:60654) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQeKd-00007w-Lv for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 12:01:35 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 05:50:48PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > A good one. So, for (my) future reference: re-writing upstream's > descriptions for Guix is no problem? No, we do it all the time, to remove advertisements for non-freeness, to drop superfluous references to freeness, to shorten, and so on. The upstream description is just often a very convenient starting point. I let Ricardo push then. Congratulations for your first contribution, and welcome aboard! Andreas