From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Subject: Re: reproducibility
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:15:21 +0200
Message-ID: <20160113111521.516a4a50@debian-netbook>
References: <CAKrPhPP+j6jfmLFk5WuHxa6q=fRO++KHkeOZ4kC-Mnw8ZxNcSA@mail.gmail.com>
	<874mel2m94.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPMn_gQMyRoa8b8ZV=o8rovfUPTbVNQnR=PraLWgXuYq3Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87bn8qa385.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPOLVB0O3uRCP=5-c5kYYdoRXknLO8uozy8cw==xtUeznw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	boundary="Sig_/BxrMPDgB=lVYBh8oZhi7wow";
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36581)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <efraim@flashner.co.il>) id 1aJHWf-00049U-CH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 04:15:34 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <efraim@flashner.co.il>) id 1aJHWa-0000MW-OV
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Jan 2016 04:15:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAKrPhPOLVB0O3uRCP=5-c5kYYdoRXknLO8uozy8cw==xtUeznw@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

--Sig_/BxrMPDgB=lVYBh8oZhi7wow
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 09:13:25 +0100
Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wro=
te:
>  [...] =20
>  [...] =20
>  [...] =20
>  [...] =20
>  [...] =20
>  [...] =20
>  [...] =20
>=20
> Just out of curiosity, could you provide a concrete example where the
> order is purposefully specified.
>=20
> Thanks,
> Fede
>=20

I haven't had time (since reading this) to test if the order matters or not,
but some of the openstack packages say they care about order:
https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/python-keystoneclient/tree/test-re=
quirements.txt?h=3D2.0.0

--=20
Efraim Flashner   <efraim@flashner.co.il>   =D7=90=D7=A4=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9D =
=D7=A4=D7=9C=D7=A9=D7=A0=D7=A8
GPG key =3D A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

--Sig_/BxrMPDgB=lVYBh8oZhi7wow
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=01y1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Sig_/BxrMPDgB=lVYBh8oZhi7wow--