From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Add ruby-mini-portile-2, upgrade ruby-nokogiri
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:02:34 -0500
Message-ID: <20151231010234.GA20422@jasmine>
References: <5679423D.9020305@uq.edu.au> <20151223190441.GA16116@jasmine>
	<56847A74.5090900@uq.edu.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47085)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aERdW-0003cz-Sw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:02:39 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aERdT-0008V6-ME
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:02:38 -0500
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:45886)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <leo@famulari.name>) id 1aERdT-0008Uq-Fy
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2015 20:02:35 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56847A74.5090900@uq.edu.au>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcroft@uq.edu.au>
Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 10:44:36AM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> 
> 
> On 24/12/15 05:04, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:29:49PM +1000, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> >>Nokogiri now requires an updated version of mini_portile (the gem was
> >>renamed to mini_portile2), but given that new versions of the 0.6.x branch
> >>still seem to be released I think keeping a separate mini_portile package is
> >>the go.
> >These are the results of `guix refresh -l ruby-mini-portile`:
> >
> >Building the following 4 packages would ensure 6 dependent packages are
> >rebuilt: ruby-pygmentize-0.0.3 ruby-nokogiri-diff-0.2.0
> >ruby-sanitize-4.0.0 bio-blastxmlparser-2.0.4
> >
> >Looks like a bit of work to properly upgrade all these and their
> >referrers to ruby-mini-portile-2! But it may be worth it to watch them
> >in the future and try to drop ruby-mini-portile when it becomes
> >possible, assuming upstream plans to deprecate it eventually.
> and I just packaged another one..
> >LGTM, thanks! Pushed as 1b9d4e2e20.
> I came across a subtle problem. Because the old miniportile is
> "ruby-mini-portile" and the new one is "ruby-mini-portile-2" but they share
> the same package name field, there doesn't seem to be any way to install the
> old miniportile from the command line:
> 
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix package -i ruby-mini-portile
> The following package will be upgraded:
>    ruby-mini-portile    0.6.2 → 2.0.0
> /gnu/store/0wlnhs4ymzj1mcm6wvc2y1ngvpj7wwls-ruby-mini-portile-2.0.0
> 
> I think maybe we should rename the old version to ruby-mini-portile-0, but
> keep the name of ruby-mini-portile-2. This would entail modifying the
> dependent packages but this is doable I would think.
> 
> WDYT?

What happens if you try `guix package -i ruby-mini-portile-0.6.2`?

> 
> Thanks,
> ben