From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Missing configure
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 10:31:21 +0100
Message-ID: <20151212093121.GA1687@debian>
References: <20151208220456.GA8049@debian>
 <CADU+-uCbkQnHS9TrL3hAmAAdkXGaBRAvebXK1K9-z2+LpeZLCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADU+-uCbkQnHS9TrL3hAmAAdkXGaBRAvebXK1K9-z2+LpeZLCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-numa-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@google.com>
Cc: linux-numa@vger.kernel.org, guix-devel@gnu.org
List-Id: guix-devel.gnu.org

Hello Filipe!

On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 07:50:07AM -0800, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> This has been fixed on 2.0.11.
> At this time, we don't really have plans to fix the 2.0.10 tarball
> retroactively... The 2.0.11 release only includes two small commits on
> top of 2.0.10, so I'd recommend going with it directly.

If there is a new release, indeed there is no need to repackage the previous
one. I just updated our numactl package in GNU Guix, and it builds well.
Thanks for your fast reaction!

Andreas