* GNOME updater @ 2015-12-07 22:40 Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-08 13:18 ` Efraim Flashner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-07 22:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Guix-devel I was distracted from important stuff and found myself writing a GNOME updater, brought to you in commit e80c0f8. Useful, and at the same time scary: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -t gnome gnu/packages/mail.scm:211:13: gmime would be upgraded from 2.6.19 to 2.6.20 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:388:12: gdk-pixbuf would be upgraded from 2.32.1 to 2.33.1 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:573:12: gtk+ would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.19.4 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:482:12: at-spi2-atk would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.19.2 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:340:12: gtksourceview would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:826:13: pangomm would be upgraded from 2.38.1 to 2.39.1 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:437:12: at-spi2-core would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.19.2 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:875:13: gtkmm would be upgraded from 3.18.0 to 3.19.3 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:852:13: atkmm would be upgraded from 2.24.1 to 2.24.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3237:13: gvfs would be upgraded from 1.24.1 to 1.26.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1302:13: libgnomeprint would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2553:13: aisleriot would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3538:13: yelp-tools would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1922:13: glib-networking would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.47.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1762:13: dconf would be upgraded from 0.22.0 to 0.24.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1517:13: gnumeric would be upgraded from 1.12.17 to 1.12.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3978:13: evolution-data-server would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1686:13: vte would be upgraded from 0.40.0 to 0.43.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1460:13: goffice would be upgraded from 0.10.14 to 0.10.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:331:13: gnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3890:13: mutter would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:748:13: glade would be upgraded from 3.8.4 to 3.19.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1340:13: libgnomeprintui would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2589:13: devhelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:462:13: gsettings-desktop-schemas would be upgraded from 3.18.0 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2167:13: gnome-terminal would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.19.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3806:13: gedit would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3691:13: file-roller would be upgraded from 3.10.0 to 3.16.4 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2121:13: gnome-mines would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2764:13: clutter-gst would be upgraded from 3.0.6 to 3.0.14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:177:13: gnome-desktop would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2462:13: gnome-settings-daemon would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3159:12: eog would be upgraded from 3.16.2 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3479:13: yelp-xsl would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2890:13: grilo would be upgraded from 0.2.12 to 0.2.14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:300:13: libgnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.6.0 to 3.12.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:587:13: adwaita-icon-theme would be upgraded from 3.16.2 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:774:13: libcroco would be upgraded from 0.6.8 to 0.6.9 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:398:13: evince would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3503:13: yelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.19.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2004:13: libsoup would be upgraded from 2.52.1 to 2.53.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3373:13: epiphany would be upgraded from 3.16.3 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2326:13: geocode-glib would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2795:13: libchamplain would be upgraded from 0.12.10 to 0.12.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3940:13: gnome-online-accounts would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2993:13: totem would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2859:13: gnome-klotski would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.19.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2736:13: clutter-gtk would be upgraded from 1.6.0 to 1.6.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1612:13: seahorse would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2074:13: libsecret would be upgraded from 0.18 to 0.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:155:13: gnome-common would be upgraded from 3.14.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:4196:13: network-manager-applet would be upgraded from 1.0.6 to 1.0.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:837:13: librsvg would be upgraded from 2.40.11 to 2.40.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2941:13: grilo-plugins would be upgraded from 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 gnu/packages/glib.scm:141:12: glib would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.47.3 gnu/packages/glib.scm:436:13: glibmm would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.47.3.1 gnu/packages/glib.scm:409:13: libsigc++ would be upgraded from 2.6.1 to 2.6.2 gnu/packages/glib.scm:230:13: gobject-introspection would be upgraded from 1.46.0 to 1.47.1 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Enjoy! :-) Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GNOME updater 2015-12-07 22:40 GNOME updater Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-08 13:18 ` Efraim Flashner 2015-12-08 15:11 ` Ludovic Courtès 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Efraim Flashner @ 2015-12-08 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5927 bytes --] On Mon, 07 Dec 2015 23:40:13 +0100 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > I was distracted from important stuff and found myself writing a GNOME > updater, brought to you in commit e80c0f8. > > Useful, and at the same time scary: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -t gnome > gnu/packages/mail.scm:211:13: gmime would be upgraded from 2.6.19 to 2.6.20 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:388:12: gdk-pixbuf would be upgraded from 2.32.1 to 2.33.1 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:573:12: gtk+ would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.19.4 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:482:12: at-spi2-atk would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.19.2 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:340:12: gtksourceview would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:826:13: pangomm would be upgraded from 2.38.1 to 2.39.1 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:437:12: at-spi2-core would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.19.2 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:875:13: gtkmm would be upgraded from 3.18.0 to 3.19.3 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:852:13: atkmm would be upgraded from 2.24.1 to 2.24.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3237:13: gvfs would be upgraded from 1.24.1 to 1.26.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1302:13: libgnomeprint would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.8 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2553:13: aisleriot would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3538:13: yelp-tools would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1922:13: glib-networking would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.47.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1762:13: dconf would be upgraded from 0.22.0 to 0.24.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1517:13: gnumeric would be upgraded from 1.12.17 to 1.12.24 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3978:13: evolution-data-server would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1686:13: vte would be upgraded from 0.40.0 to 0.43.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1460:13: goffice would be upgraded from 0.10.14 to 0.10.24 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:331:13: gnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.3 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3890:13: mutter would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:748:13: glade would be upgraded from 3.8.4 to 3.19.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1340:13: libgnomeprintui would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.6 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2589:13: devhelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:462:13: gsettings-desktop-schemas would be upgraded from 3.18.0 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2167:13: gnome-terminal would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.19.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3806:13: gedit would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3691:13: file-roller would be upgraded from 3.10.0 to 3.16.4 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2121:13: gnome-mines would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2764:13: clutter-gst would be upgraded from 3.0.6 to 3.0.14 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:177:13: gnome-desktop would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2462:13: gnome-settings-daemon would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3159:12: eog would be upgraded from 3.16.2 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3479:13: yelp-xsl would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2890:13: grilo would be upgraded from 0.2.12 to 0.2.14 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:300:13: libgnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.6.0 to 3.12.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:587:13: adwaita-icon-theme would be upgraded from 3.16.2 to 3.18.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:774:13: libcroco would be upgraded from 0.6.8 to 0.6.9 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:398:13: evince would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3503:13: yelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.19.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2004:13: libsoup would be upgraded from 2.52.1 to 2.53.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3373:13: epiphany would be upgraded from 3.16.3 to 3.18.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2326:13: geocode-glib would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2795:13: libchamplain would be upgraded from 0.12.10 to 0.12.12 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3940:13: gnome-online-accounts would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.19.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2993:13: totem would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2859:13: gnome-klotski would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.19.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2736:13: clutter-gtk would be upgraded from 1.6.0 to 1.6.6 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1612:13: seahorse would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2074:13: libsecret would be upgraded from 0.18 to 0.18.3 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:155:13: gnome-common would be upgraded from 3.14.0 to 3.18.0 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:4196:13: network-manager-applet would be upgraded from 1.0.6 to 1.0.8 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:837:13: librsvg would be upgraded from 2.40.11 to 2.40.12 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2941:13: grilo-plugins would be upgraded from 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 > gnu/packages/glib.scm:141:12: glib would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.47.3 > gnu/packages/glib.scm:436:13: glibmm would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.47.3.1 > gnu/packages/glib.scm:409:13: libsigc++ would be upgraded from 2.6.1 to 2.6.2 > gnu/packages/glib.scm:230:13: gobject-introspection would be upgraded from 1.46.0 to 1.47.1 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Enjoy! :-) > > Ludo’. > A for gnome-3, the 3.19 series AFAIK is the beta/development releases for 3.20, so would we want to update to those numbers? Also, if we don't want to use those releases, we should check if the other packages also use the odd (version minor-version) numbers as a symbol for beta/rc releases. -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GNOME updater 2015-12-08 13:18 ` Efraim Flashner @ 2015-12-08 15:11 ` Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-09 10:12 ` Efraim Flashner 2015-12-09 15:34 ` Eric Bavier 0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-08 15:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: Guix-devel Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis: > A for gnome-3, the 3.19 series AFAIK is the beta/development releases for > 3.20, so would we want to update to those numbers? Good point, we probably don’t want those. Fixed in c499125, which leads to a shorter list: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -t gnome gnu/packages/mail.scm:211:13: gmime would be upgraded from 2.6.19 to 2.6.20 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:852:13: atkmm would be upgraded from 2.24.1 to 2.24.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1612:13: seahorse would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1340:13: libgnomeprintui would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3373:13: epiphany would be upgraded from 3.16.3 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:331:13: gnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:4196:13: network-manager-applet would be upgraded from 1.0.6 to 1.0.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:837:13: librsvg would be upgraded from 2.40.11 to 2.40.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3538:13: yelp-tools would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3691:13: file-roller would be upgraded from 3.10.0 to 3.16.4 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1517:13: gnumeric would be upgraded from 1.12.17 to 1.12.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2764:13: clutter-gst would be upgraded from 3.0.6 to 3.0.14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1762:13: dconf would be upgraded from 0.22.0 to 0.24.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2941:13: grilo-plugins would be upgraded from 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3237:13: gvfs would be upgraded from 1.24.1 to 1.26.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2553:13: aisleriot would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2795:13: libchamplain would be upgraded from 0.12.10 to 0.12.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3479:13: yelp-xsl would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2074:13: libsecret would be upgraded from 0.18 to 0.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2736:13: clutter-gtk would be upgraded from 1.6.0 to 1.6.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:587:13: adwaita-icon-theme would be upgraded from 3.16.2 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1460:13: goffice would be upgraded from 0.10.14 to 0.10.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:398:13: evince would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:300:13: libgnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.6.0 to 3.12.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2326:13: geocode-glib would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2993:13: totem would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1302:13: libgnomeprint would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2589:13: devhelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2890:13: grilo would be upgraded from 0.2.12 to 0.2.14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:774:13: libcroco would be upgraded from 0.6.8 to 0.6.9 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:155:13: gnome-common would be upgraded from 3.14.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2462:13: gnome-settings-daemon would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/glib.scm:409:13: libsigc++ would be upgraded from 2.6.1 to 2.6.2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > Also, if we don't want to use those releases, we should check if the > other packages also use the odd (version minor-version) numbers as a > symbol for beta/rc releases. This is checked for GNU packages already, and I assume there’s no notion of “unstable” releases on repos such as PyPI and CRAN? Thanks for your feedback! Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GNOME updater 2015-12-08 15:11 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-09 10:12 ` Efraim Flashner 2015-12-09 17:33 ` Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-09 15:34 ` Eric Bavier 1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Efraim Flashner @ 2015-12-09 10:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1568 bytes --] On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:11:55 +0100 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis: > > > A for gnome-3, the 3.19 series AFAIK is the beta/development releases for > > 3.20, so would we want to update to those numbers? > > Good point, we probably don’t want those. > > Fixed in c499125, which leads to a shorter list: > >[snip] it might need a bit more work. For example, vte is at 0.40.0 and current upstream is 0.43.0, but presumably there is a 0.42.x release in there somewhere. Or at least for gnome-mines and -terminal, I'm sure there's a 3.18 release between our 3.16.x and upstream 3.19.x. I tried a bit at the logic but wasn't able to quickly figure something out. As a test at-spi2-atk in gtk.scm can be upgraded to 2.18.3. > > Also, if we don't want to use those releases, we should check if the > > other packages also use the odd (version minor-version) numbers as a > > symbol for beta/rc releases. > > This is checked for GNU packages already, and I assume there’s no notion > of “unstable” releases on repos such as PyPI and CRAN? Could this also be a problem for GNU packages? If we didn't update to the latest release before they put out a new development version? > > Thanks for your feedback! > > Ludo’. Always happy to help :) -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GNOME updater 2015-12-09 10:12 ` Efraim Flashner @ 2015-12-09 17:33 ` Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-09 17:58 ` Efraim Flashner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-09 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: Guix-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1590 bytes --] Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis: > On Tue, 08 Dec 2015 16:11:55 +0100 > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis: >> >> > A for gnome-3, the 3.19 series AFAIK is the beta/development releases for >> > 3.20, so would we want to update to those numbers? >> >> Good point, we probably don’t want those. >> >> Fixed in c499125, which leads to a shorter list: >> >>[snip] > > it might need a bit more work. For example, vte is at 0.40.0 and current > upstream is 0.43.0, but presumably there is a 0.42.x release in there > somewhere. Or at least for gnome-mines and -terminal, I'm sure there's a 3.18 > release between our 3.16.x and upstream 3.19.x. > > I tried a bit at the logic but wasn't able to quickly figure something out. > As a test at-spi2-atk in gtk.scm can be upgraded to 2.18.3. With the patch below, here’s what I get: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh at-spi2-core gtk+ gnome-mines vte gnome-terminal gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2168:13: gnome-terminal would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1687:13: vte would be upgraded from 0.40.0 to 0.42.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2122:13: gnome-mines would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:573:12: gtk+ would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.18.6 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:437:12: at-spi2-core would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.18.3 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- That looks good now, no? [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 2566 bytes --] diff --git a/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm b/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm index 910270f..fb54036 100644 --- a/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm +++ b/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm @@ -328,8 +328,8 @@ pairs. Example: (\"mit-scheme-9.0.1\" . \"/gnu/mit-scheme/stable.pkg/9.0.1\"). under DIRECTORY, or #f. Use FTP-OPEN and FTP-CLOSE to open (resp. close) FTP connections; this can be useful to reuse connections. -KEEP-FILE? is a predicate to decide whether to consider a given file (source -tarball) as a valid candidate based on its name. +KEEP-FILE? is a predicate to decide whether to enter a directory and to +consider a given file (source tarball) as a valid candidate based on its name. FILE->SIGNATURE must be a procedure; it is passed a source file URL and must return the corresponding signature URL, or #f it signatures are unavailable." @@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ return the corresponding signature URL, or #f it signatures are unavailable." (("w32" 'directory . _) #f) (((? contains-digit? dir) 'directory . _) - dir) + (and (keep-file? dir) dir)) (_ #f)) entries)) @@ -480,14 +480,13 @@ elpa.gnu.org, and all the GNOME packages." (match (string-tokenize (version-major+minor version) %not-dot) (((= string->number major) (= string->number minor)) - (even? minor)) + (and minor (even? minor))) (_ #t))) ;cross fingers - (define (even-numbered-tarball? file) - (let-values (((name version) (gnu-package-name->name+version file))) - (and version - (even-minor-version? version)))) + (define (even-numbered? file) + (let-values (((name version) (package-name->name+version file))) + (even-minor-version? (or version name)))) (false-if-ftp-error (latest-ftp-release package @@ -501,7 +500,7 @@ elpa.gnu.org, and all the GNOME packages." ;; <https://www.gnome.org/gnome-3/source/> explains ;; that odd minor version numbers represent development ;; releases, which we are usually not interested in. - #:keep-file? even-numbered-tarball? + #:keep-file? even-numbered? ;; ftp.gnome.org provides no signatures, only ;; checksums. [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 643 bytes --] >> > Also, if we don't want to use those releases, we should check if the >> > other packages also use the odd (version minor-version) numbers as a >> > symbol for beta/rc releases. >> >> This is checked for GNU packages already, and I assume there’s no notion >> of “unstable” releases on repos such as PyPI and CRAN? > > Could this also be a problem for GNU packages? If we didn't update to the > latest release before they put out a new development version? There could be exception, but in general, GNU packages put development releases on alpha.gnu.org, so we shouldn’t have this problem. Thanks! Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GNOME updater 2015-12-09 17:33 ` Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-09 17:58 ` Efraim Flashner 2015-12-09 21:15 ` Ludovic Courtès 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Efraim Flashner @ 2015-12-09 17:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: Guix-devel [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1217 bytes --] On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:33:39 +0100 ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis: > > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > > With the patch below, here’s what I get: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh at-spi2-core gtk+ gnome-mines vte gnome-terminal > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2168:13: gnome-terminal would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1687:13: vte would be upgraded from 0.40.0 to 0.42.1 > gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2122:13: gnome-mines would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:573:12: gtk+ would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.18.6 > gnu/packages/gtk.scm:437:12: at-spi2-core would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.18.3 > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > That looks good now, no? > looks good, as long as we're also getting all the other ones also :) Thanks! -- Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GNOME updater 2015-12-09 17:58 ` Efraim Flashner @ 2015-12-09 21:15 ` Ludovic Courtès 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-09 21:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Efraim Flashner; +Cc: Guix-devel Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis: > On Wed, 09 Dec 2015 18:33:39 +0100 > ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote: > >> Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il> skribis: >> >> [...] >> [...] >> [...] >> [...] >> [...] >> >> With the patch below, here’s what I get: >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh at-spi2-core gtk+ gnome-mines vte gnome-terminal >> gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2168:13: gnome-terminal would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 >> gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1687:13: vte would be upgraded from 0.40.0 to 0.42.1 >> gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2122:13: gnome-mines would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 >> gnu/packages/gtk.scm:573:12: gtk+ would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.18.6 >> gnu/packages/gtk.scm:437:12: at-spi2-core would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.18.3 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> That looks good now, no? >> > > looks good, as long as we're also getting all the other ones also :) > Thanks! Great, committing. And yes, we do have many others: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- $ ./pre-inst-env guix refresh -t gnome gnu/packages/gtk.scm:852:13: atkmm would be upgraded from 2.24.1 to 2.24.2 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:573:12: gtk+ would be upgraded from 3.18.2 to 3.18.6 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:437:12: at-spi2-core would be upgraded from 2.18.1 to 2.18.3 gnu/packages/gtk.scm:388:12: gdk-pixbuf would be upgraded from 2.32.1 to 2.32.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:155:13: gnome-common would be upgraded from 3.14.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2005:13: libsoup would be upgraded from 2.52.1 to 2.52.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2327:13: geocode-glib would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:748:13: glade would be upgraded from 3.8.5 to 3.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3539:13: yelp-tools would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1461:13: goffice would be upgraded from 0.10.14 to 0.10.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2765:13: clutter-gst would be upgraded from 3.0.6 to 3.0.14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3374:13: epiphany would be upgraded from 3.16.3 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1341:13: libgnomeprintui would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:177:13: gnome-desktop would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2463:13: gnome-settings-daemon would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2994:13: totem would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1687:13: vte would be upgraded from 0.40.0 to 0.42.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:300:13: libgnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.6.0 to 3.12.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3692:13: file-roller would be upgraded from 3.10.0 to 3.16.4 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:462:13: gsettings-desktop-schemas would be upgraded from 3.18.0 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2891:13: grilo would be upgraded from 0.2.12 to 0.2.14 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2075:13: libsecret would be upgraded from 0.18 to 0.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1763:13: dconf would be upgraded from 0.22.0 to 0.24.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:4197:13: network-manager-applet would be upgraded from 1.0.6 to 1.0.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1303:13: libgnomeprint would be upgraded from 2.8.2 to 2.18.8 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3238:13: gvfs would be upgraded from 1.24.1 to 1.26.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3160:12: eog would be upgraded from 3.16.2 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3891:13: mutter would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1613:13: seahorse would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:838:13: librsvg would be upgraded from 2.40.11 to 2.40.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3807:13: gedit would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:775:13: libcroco would be upgraded from 0.6.8 to 0.6.9 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2796:13: libchamplain would be upgraded from 0.12.10 to 0.12.12 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3504:13: yelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2860:13: gnome-klotski would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2737:13: clutter-gtk would be upgraded from 1.6.0 to 1.6.6 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:331:13: gnome-keyring would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.3 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2122:13: gnome-mines would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:1518:13: gnumeric would be upgraded from 1.12.17 to 1.12.24 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:587:13: adwaita-icon-theme would be upgraded from 3.16.2 to 3.18.0 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2942:13: grilo-plugins would be upgraded from 0.2.14 to 0.2.16 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3480:13: yelp-xsl would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2554:13: aisleriot would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2590:13: devhelp would be upgraded from 3.16.1 to 3.18.1 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:398:13: evince would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:2168:13: gnome-terminal would be upgraded from 3.16.0 to 3.18.2 gnu/packages/gnome.scm:3941:13: gnome-online-accounts would be upgraded from 3.18.1 to 3.18.2.1 gnu/packages/glib.scm:436:13: glibmm would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.46.2 gnu/packages/glib.scm:141:12: glib would be upgraded from 2.46.1 to 2.46.2 gnu/packages/glib.scm:409:13: libsigc++ would be upgraded from 2.6.1 to 2.6.2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Thanks! Ludo’. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: GNOME updater 2015-12-08 15:11 ` Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-09 10:12 ` Efraim Flashner @ 2015-12-09 15:34 ` Eric Bavier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Eric Bavier @ 2015-12-09 15:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: ludo; +Cc: Guix-devel On 2015-12-08 09:11, ludo@gnu.org wrote: >> Also, if we don't want to use those releases, we should check if the >> other packages also use the odd (version minor-version) numbers as a >> symbol for beta/rc releases. > > This is checked for GNU packages already, and I assume there’s no > notion > of “unstable” releases on repos such as PyPI and CRAN? "developer" releases are sometimes uploaded to CPAN. I'll try to address that in the cpan updater I'm working on. -- `~Eric ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-09 21:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2015-12-07 22:40 GNOME updater Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-08 13:18 ` Efraim Flashner 2015-12-08 15:11 ` Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-09 10:12 ` Efraim Flashner 2015-12-09 17:33 ` Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-09 17:58 ` Efraim Flashner 2015-12-09 21:15 ` Ludovic Courtès 2015-12-09 15:34 ` Eric Bavier
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.