Re: armhf build machines

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:36:46AM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 11:14:24AM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> > The impression I got from looking at the build farm thank-yous on the website
> > was that we have lowered requirements for what we're looking for in armhf
> > build machines, at least in terms of RAM. In terms of freedom the Raspberry
> > Pi 2 isn't great, but in terms of cost its pretty inexpensive.  Is this
> > something we'd be interested in?
> 
> We are waiting for two new Novena boards that should arrive before the
> end of the year. The current bottleneck is not the build machines, but hydra;
> already now the build farm could sustain more jobs in parallel, but we
> artificially limit them. So I would say that there is currently no need
> to add more build machines. This may change if we get a physical machine
> for hydra.

What sort of machine would be appropriate for hydra?

> Andreas
> 
>