From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mpv-minimal. Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 18:13:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20151204171327.GD6556@debian> References: <87d1um2o3f.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54494) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4tvK-0005Xi-2U for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:13:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4tvH-00035o-Af for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:13:33 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.135]:60924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4tvH-00035d-0T for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 12:13:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87d1um2o3f.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 07:08:36PM +0300, Alex Kost wrote: > I cry every time I see samba during updating my profile, so I wonder if > it is acceptable to have "mpv-minimal" which is less heavy on > dependencies. If so, perhaps the other people have ideas what inputs > may also be removed, thanks. Or would it make sense to remove samba altogether from the regular mpv package? Andreas