From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add cereal + sparsehash Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 21:06:06 +0100 Message-ID: <20151130200606.GD10869@debian> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48465) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3UiO-0000cY-RY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:06:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3UiL-00034p-KT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:06:24 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.24]:56100) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a3UiL-00034b-Bg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 15:06:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel Hello, sorry for being late, I am still catching up. On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 01:53:25PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > The second patch adds “sparsehash” to the “crypto” module. It’s > probably not the best module for this package — can you suggest any > other location for a hash table library? If it is not a cryptographically secure hash, it should go anywhere, but not to the cryptography module. Both are called by the same name in English, but are completely different things. Could you move it somewhere else? Andreas