* [PATCH] Update numactl
@ 2015-10-17 19:49 Andreas Enge
2015-10-17 21:18 ` Andreas Enge
2015-10-18 17:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2015-10-17 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw
To: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 317 bytes --]
The attached patch updates numactl. My secret hope is that it will now build
on arm (together with potentially 15 dependent packages). I successfully
compiled hwloc with it.
Is the comment about the test suite still valid? I tried to run the tests,
they require taskset (which is available in util-linux).
Andreas
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-numactl-Update-to-2.0.10.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2967 bytes --]
From 9c620c228a99335798212f37d3788a9bfa353a78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:42:42 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: numactl: Update to 2.0.10.
* gnu/packages/linux.scm (numactl)[source]: Update to 2.0.10.
[arguments]: Adapt phases to use the autotools machinery.
[native-inputs]: Add autotools packages.
---
gnu/packages/linux.scm | 38 +++++++++++++-------------------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 4ee4234..d4b9229 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ file system is as easy as logging into the server with an SSH client.")
(define-public numactl
(package
(name "numactl")
- (version "2.0.9")
+ (version "2.0.10")
(source (origin
(method url-fetch)
(uri (string-append
@@ -1398,35 +1398,23 @@ file system is as easy as logging into the server with an SSH client.")
".tar.gz"))
(sha256
(base32
- "073myxlyyhgxh1w3r757ajixb7s2k69czc3r0g12c3scq7k3784w"))))
+ "0qfv2ks6d3gm0mw5sj4cbhsd7cbsb7qm58xvchl2wfzifkzcinnv"))))
(build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("autoconf" ,autoconf)
+ ("automake" ,automake)
+ ("libtool" ,libtool)))
(arguments
- '(#:phases (alist-replace
- 'configure
- (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
- ;; There's no 'configure' script, just a raw makefile.
- (substitute* "Makefile"
- (("^prefix := .*$")
- (string-append "prefix := " (assoc-ref outputs "out")
- "\n"))
- (("^libdir := .*$")
- ;; By default the thing tries to install under
- ;; $prefix/lib64 when on a 64-bit platform.
- (string-append "libdir := $(prefix)/lib\n"))))
- %standard-phases)
-
- #:make-flags (list
- ;; By default the thing tries to use 'cc'.
- "CC=gcc"
-
- ;; Make sure programs have an RPATH so they can find
- ;; libnuma.so.
- (string-append "LDLIBS=-Wl,-rpath="
- (assoc-ref %outputs "out") "/lib"))
-
+ '(#:phases
+ (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (add-after
+ 'unpack 'autogen
+ (lambda _
+ (zero? (system* "sh" "autogen.sh")))))
;; There's a 'test' target, but it requires NUMA support in the kernel
;; to run, which we can't assume to have.
#:tests? #f))
+
(home-page "http://oss.sgi.com/projects/libnuma/")
(synopsis "Tools for non-uniform memory access (NUMA) machines")
(description
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Update numactl
2015-10-17 19:49 [PATCH] Update numactl Andreas Enge
@ 2015-10-17 21:18 ` Andreas Enge
2015-12-08 22:12 ` Andreas Enge
2015-10-18 17:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2015-10-17 21:18 UTC (permalink / raw
To: guix-devel
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 09:49:17PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> The attached patch updates numactl. My secret hope is that it will now build
> on arm (together with potentially 15 dependent packages). I successfully
> compiled hwloc with it.
It does not build on arm. On debian, hwloc does not depend on libnuma
on the armel and armhf architectures:
https://packages.debian.org/jessie/libhwloc5
So maybe we could make it an input only for non-arm architectures?
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Update numactl
2015-10-17 19:49 [PATCH] Update numactl Andreas Enge
2015-10-17 21:18 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2015-10-18 17:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-12-08 22:12 ` Andreas Enge
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-10-18 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: guix-devel
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
> Is the comment about the test suite still valid? I tried to run the tests,
> they require taskset (which is available in util-linux).
I don’t know; I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s still valid.
> From 9c620c228a99335798212f37d3788a9bfa353a78 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2015 21:42:42 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: numactl: Update to 2.0.10.
>
> * gnu/packages/linux.scm (numactl)[source]: Update to 2.0.10.
> [arguments]: Adapt phases to use the autotools machinery.
> [native-inputs]: Add autotools packages.
LGTM.
> + (native-inputs
> + `(("autoconf" ,autoconf)
> + ("automake" ,automake)
> + ("libtool" ,libtool)))
Pfff… Could you email upstream and ask them to run ‘make dist’ next
time? It’s really weird: They used to do it, and it looks as if they
had forgotten. :-/
Thanks,
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Update numactl
2015-10-18 17:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2015-12-08 22:12 ` Andreas Enge
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2015-12-08 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: guix-devel
On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 07:35:44PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Pfff… Could you email upstream and ask them to run ‘make dist’ next
> time? It’s really weird: They used to do it, and it looks as if they
> had forgotten. :-/
No, they did not use the autotools and had just a Makefile.
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Update numactl
2015-10-17 21:18 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2015-12-08 22:12 ` Andreas Enge
2015-12-09 13:55 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Enge @ 2015-12-08 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw
To: guix-devel
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> It does not build on arm. On debian, hwloc does not depend on libnuma
> on the armel and armhf architectures:
> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/libhwloc5
> So maybe we could make it an input only for non-arm architectures?
What do you think of this suggestion?
Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Update numactl
2015-12-08 22:12 ` Andreas Enge
@ 2015-12-09 13:55 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2015-12-09 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Andreas Enge; +Cc: guix-devel
Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:
> On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 11:18:25PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> It does not build on arm. On debian, hwloc does not depend on libnuma
>> on the armel and armhf architectures:
>> https://packages.debian.org/jessie/libhwloc5
>> So maybe we could make it an input only for non-arm architectures?
>
> What do you think of this suggestion?
What’s the rationale for this special case? That libnuma doesn’t
support ARM?
If that’s the case, the suggestion sounds good to me.
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-09 13:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-17 19:49 [PATCH] Update numactl Andreas Enge
2015-10-17 21:18 ` Andreas Enge
2015-12-08 22:12 ` Andreas Enge
2015-12-09 13:55 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-10-18 17:35 ` Ludovic Courtès
2015-12-08 22:12 ` Andreas Enge
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.