From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: failing packages Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 22:11:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20151016201135.GA14772@debian> References: <20151006124812.3e2c2f3f@debian-netbook> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnBLr-0004sB-7b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:11:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnBLo-0003ji-1B for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:11:43 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:63142) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZnBLn-0003iq-M0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:11:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151006124812.3e2c2f3f@debian-netbook> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Efraim Flashner Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:48:12PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: > chicken: > guix refresh -l chicken: no dependant packages. > Has not built successfully since early May. > x86_64: http://hydra.gnu.org/build/701776/nixlog/1 (~1900 lines) runtime tests > timed out > armhf: http://hydra.gnu.org/build/701673/nixlog/1 (~4300 lines) tests pass > (including runtime tests) until ports test > Error: (line 294) invalid escape-sequence '\x o' => Embedded NUL bytes in > filenames are rejected. > mips64el: http://hydra.gnu.org/build/699177/nixlog/1 same as arm > i686: http://hydra.gnu.org/build/698575/nixlog/1 same as x86_64 Should we simply drop this? Or would someone like to try an update to the most recent version 4.10.0? > fastcap: > fails on all hardware targets. > has not built successfully since August 1st. Does the software really date from 1992 as the filename suggests?! Here only the documentation does not build; maybe the fix-doc phase should be modified? Is anybody interested in the package, or should we drop it? > gnurl: > fails on all targets. > test 46 fails. updating to 7.40.0 also fails at test 46. 7.43.0 is missing > install.sh, so it doesn't build. currently waiting on 7.44.0 from gnunet. I reported this already before your message in a private e-mail to upstream, and will try to report it in some bug tracker. Andreas