From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Cross-compilation from armhf to mips64el Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 11:10:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20151009091037.GB6166@debian> References: <20151005190838.GA5006@debian> <87pp0rbx28.fsf@gnu.org> <20151008184814.GA3800@debian> <87egh4ookh.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55368) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkThk-0004E2-OH for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 05:11:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZkThg-0002N4-QB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Oct 2015 05:11:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87egh4ookh.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Thu, Oct 08, 2015 at 08:47:26PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Note that we successfully cross-compile from i686 to > mips64el-linux-gnu, so I guess that works. Oh I see, there was a misunderstanding on my part - I somehow thought that we were successfully disabling the cross-build from i686 to mips. So do I understand correctly now that the procedure from-32-to-64? is currently superfluous, since we do not currently build for the target mips64el-linux-gnuabi64? Sorry for the noise based on my fundamental misunderstanding! Andreas