From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: 01/02: gnu: libbluray: Upgrade to 0.9.1.
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 20:28:13 +0200
Message-ID: <20151006182813.GA10579@debian>
References: <20151006122208.24501.87369@vcs.savannah.gnu.org>
	<E1ZjRFx-0006O7-AY@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87y4fgkllm.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20151006174132.GA4259@debian>
	<20151006204544.668569db@debian-netbook>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34460)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZjWyN-0008CR-UT
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:28:24 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZjWyM-0003p4-T7
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 14:28:23 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151006204544.668569db@debian-netbook>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 08:45:44PM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote:
> Yikes! Thats not good at all. That seems like a really good reason to apply
> the second patch to take out java and put in the compile flag.

Very well, thanks for your quick reaction!

Andreas