From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: qt-4: Disable webkit build. Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2015 11:36:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20151004093627.GA6264@debian> References: <20151003225510.GA28550@debian> <87zizz6odd.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32884) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zifif-0005Gs-EF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 05:36:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zifie-000660-Hc for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Oct 2015 05:36:37 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zizz6odd.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sun, Oct 04, 2015 at 10:15:26AM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > LGTM. I think we should also rm -rf the code in a snippet. Good point. > Besides, would our WebKit be picked up if we added it as an input? I do not think so, I did not see any configure option of the kind. Anyway, the real aim would be to get rid of qt-4 altogether; but we have a few packages that still require it and that have no new version that could be compiled with qt-5. > Please keep updated and mention it in the > commit log. Will do, although, as mentioned above, I would only consider progress on qt-5 as real progress. Andreas