From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Libressl
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 22:26:11 +0200
Message-ID: <20150703202611.GA26610@debian>
References: <20150615191102.GA4777@debian> <87eglciv83.fsf@netris.org>
	<20150615203014.GB5980@debian> <87k2v4hdux.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46473)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZB7Xi-00049q-EQ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:26:39 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZB7Xd-0000fF-Fl
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:26:38 -0400
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:54726)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1ZB7Xd-0000f9-5h
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Jul 2015 16:26:33 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87k2v4hdux.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> The license you pasted is the original SSLeay License, whereas
> <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpenSSL> says:
>   The license of OpenSSL is a conjunction of two licenses, one of them
>   being the license of SSLeay.  You must follow both.  [...]
> 
> However, I see now that this is a bit confusing, and we made a mistake
> in our 'license' field of our OpenSSL package.  My casual reading of the
> above text led me believe that the "OpenSSL License" is itself a
> conjunction of the two licenses, but I see that
> <http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:OpenSSL> does not include the
> SSLeay license.
> 
> So, I think we should add 'ssleay' to (guix licenses) and then add it to
> the license field of 'openssl' along with a comment explaining that the
> requirements of both (all?) licenses must be followed.

So this looks essentially like a bug in
   https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpenSSL
Would you like to report it (where?)?
Then it would be good if the SSLeay license could be added as
   org/wiki/License:...
before we add it to our license collection.

Andreas