From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: Add guile-minikanren Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 21:51:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20150423195129.GA1552@debian> References: <87wq14dwd9.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <20150423131751.GA12941@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr> <87d22uekq5.fsf@gnu.org> <5683758a81dab8c8c4a07b4b76944938@openmailbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50382) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlN9v-0005Jl-Ve for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:51:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YlN9v-0008HP-5E for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 15:51:39 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5683758a81dab8c8c4a07b4b76944938@openmailbox.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Eric Bavier Cc: guix-devel On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 02:48:50PM -0500, Eric Bavier wrote: > Why not use YYYYMMDD.<7-char-sha> so that the version is less arbitrary? It > would still sort for upgrades. I would support this idea, or drop the git hash (it is in the source code anyway, and I think it unlikely we will have create two releases on the same day). Andreas