From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: patch: Update to 2.7.5. Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2015 10:32:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20150308093238.GA16868@debian> References: <20150307233218.5703.47752@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <87y4n8jmkg.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58635) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUXa7-0001uU-RU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 05:33:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUXa4-0006J6-LM for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 05:33:07 -0400 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:54720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUXa4-0006Io-As for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Mar 2015 05:33:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y4n8jmkg.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 08:38:07PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > This triggered a full rebuild, so I reverted it. This is a change for > core-updates. Sorry! I trusted "guix refresh -l patch", although the result was a bit surprising... Should we maybe move it to base.scm? Andreas