From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Propagate inputs for libxml2 and libxslt Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2015 18:17:31 +0100 Message-ID: <20150228171731.GA19552@debian> References: <87zj7y6onw.fsf@fsf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48999) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRl1G-00036q-TO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:17:39 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRl1C-0003c7-Th for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:17:38 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:61045) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YRl1C-0003bm-Iy for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 28 Feb 2015 12:17:34 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zj7y6onw.fsf@fsf.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: David Thompson Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:28:35AM -0500, David Thompson wrote: > Two small patches below for propagating the necessary inputs for libxml2 > and libxslt. These should probably be applied to core-updates, right? > Notably, these patches triggers a rebuild of subversion. > > Once these patches are applied, would it be a good idea to go through > the packages that depend on libxml2 and libxslt and remove the now > propagated inputs? I would say "yes" to all. Andreas