From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] gnu: Add emotion-generic-players
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:03:33 +0100
Message-ID: <20150226120333.GA9020@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
References: <1424910673-17665-1-git-send-email-sleep_walker@suse.cz>
	<1424910673-17665-4-git-send-email-sleep_walker@suse.cz>
	<20150226102308.GA3600@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
	<20150226111443.GB10407@venom>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40878)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YQxAP-0007cb-9h
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:03:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YQxAL-0002In-5B
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:03:45 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:64105)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YQxAK-0002Hq-Rg
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 07:03:41 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150226111443.GB10407@venom>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:14:43PM +0100, Tomáš Čech wrote:
> I do agree that use of "Enlightenment Foundation Libraries" instead of
> "EFL" could make it more enjoyable to read, but we could expand also
> Gimp toolkit, Tool Command Language, ...
> Those who would need such these packages will know and it won't help
> to others anyway.

Here it is not a question of enjoyment; personally, I have heard of
Enlightenment, but would not be able to understand EFL immediately.

> I believe efl.scm is more accurate as the packages there would be EFL
> based but not necessarily Enlightenment related.

Okay, I see.

Andreas