From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: Gnupg update
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2015 10:34:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20150220093418.GA20321@debian.math.u-bordeaux1.fr>
References: <20150219210521.GA12129@debian>
 <87pp95fovj.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50665)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YOjyz-0001gU-SP
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:34:50 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YOjyt-0005W1-06
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:34:49 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.13]:49471)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YOjys-0005Vm-Ma
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 Feb 2015 04:34:42 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87pp95fovj.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 06:44:16PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Minor nit: According to our conventions, instead of listing the same
> file twice, write this:
> * gnu/packages/gnupg.scm (gnupg): Update to 2.1.2.
>   (gnupg-2.0): Copy of previous package for version 2.0.26.

Good point, I amended this.

> One more note of caution: I notice that you added 'npth' to core-updates
> instead of master, so I guess this needs to go to core-updates also.  In
> retrospect, they both could have gone to master.

Indeed. I started work on updating the packages in gnupg.scm on core-updates,
since I overestimated the impact it would have on package rebuilds ("guix
refresh -l gnupg" shows that in fact only a few packages depend on gnupg).
So to facilitate merging, I continued in core-updates.

Andreas