From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Gnupg-1 Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2015 19:41:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20150215184135.GA25340@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN48X-0003p2-7R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:41:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN48S-0005Uv-H3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:41:45 -0500 Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.187]:52596) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YN48S-0005TO-5Z for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Feb 2015 13:41:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org Hello, in the process of updating gnupg, I noticed that we have two packages left that depend explicitly on gnupg-1, duplicity and hdup. For duplicity, the latest version is 0.7.01. Eric, you added both of these; could you maybe check whether they can use gnupg-2 after updating? Andreas