From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Bavier Subject: Re: gnu: Add CLISP. Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 07:26:35 -0600 Message-ID: <20150213072635.661d6a9b@PocketWee> References: <87lhk2eloq.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <20150212212052.687467f1@PocketWee> <8761b6tga7.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39196) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMGG4-0005Ye-CP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:26:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMGG0-00037i-D7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:26:12 -0500 Received: from mail.centurylink.net ([205.219.233.9]:42558 helo=smtp.centurylink.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YMGG0-00037Y-7r for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 13 Feb 2015 08:26:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <8761b6tga7.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:35:44 -0500 Mark H Weaver wrote: > Eric Bavier writes: >=20 > > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:48:05 +0100 > > taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer) wrote: > > > >> From 6201470b3e6c2410be7f38d8cc1cc99c3b13f0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> From: =3D?UTF-8?q?Taylan=3D20Ulrich=3D20Bay=3DC4=3DB1rl=3DC4=3DB1/Kamm= er?=3D > >> > >> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:19:52 +0100 > >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add CLISP. >=20 > I agree with all of Eric's feedback, with one exception: >=20 > >> + (description "GNU CLISP is an implementation of ANSI Common > >> Lisp, with +many extensions. It includes an interpreter, compiler, > > ^ > > "+many" -> "many" > [...] > > Copy and paste + wrapping errors? ;) >=20 > This seems to be a problem on your end, Eric. I guess that your mail > client word-wrapped Taylan's patch. The '+'s you see intermixed were at > the beginning of each line of the patch, of course. Indeed, this was my error (using an unfamiliar email client). My apologies for the noise. >=20 > >> + ;; Website says gpl2+, COPYRIGHT file says gpl2; actual source > >> files have > >> + ;; a lot of gpl3+. (Also some parts are under non-copyleft > >> licenses, such > >> + ;; as CLX by Texas Instruments.) > >> + (license (list license:gpl2 license:gpl2+ license:gpl3+)))) > > > > I think in this case the gpl3+ might "win out", but I'll let others > > comment on that. >=20 > Yes, I think that's correct. Thanks for the confirmation. `~Eric