Re: gnu: Add CLISP.

[Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org>]

On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 02:35:44 -0500
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> wrote:

> Eric Bavier <bavier@member.fsf.org> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:48:05 +0100
> > taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer) wrote:
> >
> >> From 6201470b3e6c2410be7f38d8cc1cc99c3b13f0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
> >>  <taylanbayirli@gmail.com>
> >> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:19:52 +0100
> >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add CLISP.
> 
> I agree with all of Eric's feedback, with one exception:
> 
> >> +    (description "GNU CLISP is an implementation of ANSI Common
> >> Lisp, with +many extensions.  It includes an interpreter, compiler,
> >              ^
> > "+many" -> "many"
> [...]
> > Copy and paste + wrapping errors? ;)
> 
> This seems to be a problem on your end, Eric.  I guess that your mail
> client word-wrapped Taylan's patch.  The '+'s you see intermixed were at
> the beginning of each line of the patch, of course.

Indeed, this was my error (using an unfamiliar email client).  My
apologies for the noise.

> 
> >> +    ;; Website says gpl2+, COPYRIGHT file says gpl2; actual source
> >> files have
> >> +    ;; a lot of gpl3+.  (Also some parts are under non-copyleft
> >> licenses, such
> >> +    ;; as CLX by Texas Instruments.)
> >> +    (license (list license:gpl2 license:gpl2+ license:gpl3+))))
> >
> > I think in this case the gpl3+ might "win out", but I'll let others
> > comment on that.
> 
> Yes, I think that's correct.

Thanks for the confirmation.

`~Eric