From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Enge Subject: Re: [PATCH]: gnu: Add HISAT. Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:23:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20150211162314.GA14344@debian> References: <87fvae8z7h.fsf@gnu.org> <20150211111501.GA5291@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58905) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLa4S-0006DO-QF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:23:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YLa4R-0002sn-SJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 11:23:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix-devel On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 05:14:13PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > A recurring error is apparently related to embedded assembly > instructions: > I wrote the author an email to ask whether this can be fixed upstream > for other architectures than x86_64. Until then should I just declare > x86_64 as the only supported architecture? I would say so. On their homepage, besides the source code they provide binaries, but only for "Linux x86_64" and "Mac OS X x86_64". I am not surprised that high performance computing tools require a high performance platform. Probably it is not interesting anyway to run the code on other architectures. Andreas