From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: missing input and more
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 17:01:07 +0100
Message-ID: <20150205160107.GA28749@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
References: <20150205070425.GA25300@venom>
	<20150205103004.GA21848@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr>
	<87zj8s62rl.fsf@gmail.com> <87pp9oh8pk.wl-tcech@suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52232)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YJOrp-0000az-4a
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:01:22 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YJOrj-0000kD-57
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:01:21 -0500
Received: from mout.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.131]:62173)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YJOri-0000k4-Ra
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Feb 2015 11:01:15 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87pp9oh8pk.wl-tcech@suse.cz>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Tomas Cech <tcech@suse.cz>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 12:57:27PM +0100, Tomas Cech wrote:
> But that fixed only one problem while we should do something dependencies in
> general.
> 
> Imagine I have not came with this bug and some other people would just added
> zlib to the inputs. We could have it wrong on multiple places and when we
> would replace gnutls with something else in future, it would stay there
> unnoticed.
> 
> I can hack some script to do the checks but I believe that everyone would
> appreciate clean solution which would check dependencies after build as a part
> of build process...

Maybe we could extend "guix lint" so that it compiles the package and performs
checks on the output (for instance, looking for .pc files and checking
whether libraries are correctly propagated)?

Andreas