From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: A couple roadblocks using guix
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 22:48:42 +0100
Message-ID: <20150123214842.GA26317@debian>
References: <CAMwaQAKwLG2LR337mcUKQ=vmjSGcWW9+6292bN+ytXs23hABZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87oapqzgka.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJ=RwfZAOt+_QFSQj96=SCVNcqH6Nj2vNwKzMwZrcOOQfSYq0w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87ppa5x4y1.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53562)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YEm69-0001Od-2O
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:49:01 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YEm68-00027A-Bw
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2015 16:49:01 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <87ppa5x4y1.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 09:43:34AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> So in general I agree it’s a good idea, and it’s easily done with
> ‘union-build’, so if people know of useful meta-packages, please
> send a patch.

Why not an empty package with only propagated inputs?

Andreas