From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Subject: Re: gobject-introspection typelibs and shared libraries
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:47:36 +0100
Message-ID: <20150116204736.GA10223@debian>
References: <CAKrPhPPyazem2RYndCeFsKFWaDfJn6uZiUgXN-7_5DNfEaRgCQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87k31zll2s.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPNdC=O1teN=HO7VZcOB0W-L3Dq4ZL=woDSoD8ivFUHFkw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87h9wumz6f.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPM9RZV-T+6KZMbuDKu-tPynGEwnFf43iPEPnjqKwuHZNQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87zj9m8m7p.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPMgGiHiRSOH-+f+Hns-GzRDLzk=zcRH2+7fQyY1i_3J1Q@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wq4p3xfe.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAKrPhPNgJw7YNdhL4+AOZm1cS0d+A5yioYr-U65JpH=e0KQQiA@mail.gmail.com>
	<871tmv4t65.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55338)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YCDo8-0006Cs-Qy
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:47:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <andreas@enge.fr>) id 1YCDo7-0001oz-S0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Jan 2015 15:47:52 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <871tmv4t65.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-15?Q?Court=E8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>, Federico Beffa <beffa@ieee.org>

On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:42:42PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> If there’s consensus to install the symlink, that’s fine with me (if we
> take that route, I would also suggest submitting a patch upstream so GCC
> installs the symlink.)

I am not in favour of adding such a symlink on our own and would rather
keep with the standard builds as we usually do when there is no compelling
reason to do otherwise.

Andreas