From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Darrington Subject: Re: wip-libreoffice status? Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2015 13:12:33 +0100 Message-ID: <20150111121233.GA14398@intra> References: <1420630189-3971-1-git-send-email-iyzsong@gmail.com> <87387m1qo2.fsf@netris.org> <87lhldmnpi.fsf@gmail.com> <87387igxbw.fsf@gnu.org> <20150111073030.GA28900@jocasta.intra> <87wq4tlpq4.fsf@gmail.com> <20150111082833.GA15352@jocasta.intra> <87oaq5bmul.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33200) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAHNo-0001YY-Ok for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 07:12:41 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YAHNl-0007UO-Jp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2015 07:12:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87oaq5bmul.fsf_-_@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:03:46PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: What=E2=80=99s the status of wip-libreoffice? It seems to have built successfully a couple of times: =20 http://hydra.gnu.org/job/gnu/wip-libreoffice/libreoffice-4.3.2.2.x86= _64-linux =20 What about cherry-picking the relevant commits into master (after =E2= =80=98nss=E2=80=99 has been committed)? Perhaps some cleanup is needed before? =20 As I recall, the status was that one of the self tests failed (crashed on s= tartup). (The libreoffice build system, runs the tests in the "make" target, not the= "make check" target.) In order to try to diagnose the problem, I pushed a change which should hav= e=20 caused the test to run under gdb. This change also had the unintended=20 consequence that it masked the return value of the test, meaning that it=20 "passes" instead of fails. It's not entirely clear what that test is supposed to be doing. --=20 PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3=20 fingerprint =3D 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3 See http://sks-keyservers.net or any PGP keyserver for public key. --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlSyaLAACgkQimdxnC3oJ7NjRACeMh3oqVwaKXVUWITGxK6UKJZ6 GGUAn0Zpul8EDlBdVdMUXbHyyrbuiV+W =WbaQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--